How Should Singapore’s Built Environment Change Post-Pandemic?
The lessons and issues brought forth by Covid-19 will have an impact on urban planning and the buildings we live in
I feel that the Covid-19 crisis has shifted the world’s focus from that of wealth to health. It is evident that global economies can be severely disrupted when healthcare and wellness infrastructures are not equipped to protect societies and communities from such a pathogenic outbreak. Consequently the planning and design of cities, urban spaces and architecture are already being re-examined in terms of their resilience and adaptability.
Being reviewed are our supply chains, food security, healthcare infrastructure and issues such as the equitable access of public domains like parks. Similar to how businesses develop ‘continuity plans’, cities would have to re-evaluate their ‘urban life continuity plans’. These plans not only protect lives and livelihoods, they seek to minimise disruption of people’s way-of-life while responding to state’s measures.
The current demand of long periods of telecommuting may reveal challenges for dwelling units designed to maximise open space as they might conversely lack the logistics to create private spaces for working. In cities such as Japan and Hong Kong, with typically smaller dwelling outfits and more prevalent open-plan designs, there may be a short-term demand to look at a shift from the present residential living model. I have read that in some Japanese households, for occupants to work from home, camping tents have to be deployed within living quarters to give them some privacy from their young children.
Abort the idea of underground living; instead advance the technology of floating developments. The creation of an isolation island can double up as outdoor recreational space in non-pandemic times. Re-deploy all the old unused school buildings now in dilapidation (held by Singapore Land Authority) for worker’s dormitories. They are ideal as they contain ready classrooms and amenities that can be easily converted to dormitories, playing fields, canteens and multipurpose halls.
Air conditioning should be optional and should not be considered a primary mode of ventilation like it is now. The primary mode of ventilation should be natural cross ventilation. In this vein, courtyards, air-wells and gardens should be made mandatory in intermediate terrace houses. Both houses and apartments should be designed to have more voluminous and higher ceilings.
It’s also time to abolish the idea of household shelters, as the new enemy is no longer shrapnel but viruses. I feel it is better to have a mandatory survival store rather than a household shelter.
During the COVID-19 outbreak, we see the benefits of peripheral sub-centres or poly-centric urban organisation – here at the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD), we are close to medical care at Changi General Hospital, heartland shopping malls at Bedok and Tampines, and open space at East Coast Park. While under the circuit breaker period, we are self-sufficient in our districts, and this goes a long way to making our city resilient in the face of this challenge.
In contemporary HDB high-rise housing, a family of three occupies 110 square metres in a five-room flat (36 square metres per person) whereas sixty years before in the low-rise slums of Singapore’s central area, there was as little as 4.74 square metres living space per person. This almost ten-fold increase in personal living space is a fundamental reason Singapore is doing relatively well in today’s Covid-19 pandemic.
No one had anticipated the surge in demand for grocery deliveries that has come with social distancing and as a result, there has been a big scramble to provide this service, which is critical for the elderly and immuno-compromised. While grocery and delivery employees are doing admirable work, I think if we made the process more efficient we could better meet this and any future surge in demand.
Of course, the façades of present day HDB blocks are not easily navigable for a drone. Can you imagine the difficulty of navigating around the hanging laundry? We can design future housing to accommodate our new robot helpers, making drone delivery practical and non-invasive for residents.
Once a system like drone-delivery is in place, it provides an additional layer of connectivity, making the city more resilient when it faces challenges like a pandemic. In a future scenario where our roads are over-crowded, damaged, or flooded, we will be glad to have aerial solutions for moving people and goods around.
There has been a lot of anxiety over whether we could run out of food as the fact that Singapore imports more than 90 per cent of its food is repeated constantly. I think as a result of what’s happening now, the government is going to ramp up funding for innovative approaches towards food security. Think about it – when it comes down to it, what do we need? We need shelter, water, clean air and food. We’ve taken care of most of it but the food part is still lagging behind and one of the things that will shift – from a consumer perspective – is where can I source for locally-grown food? How do we bring the producer and consumer closer together? It’s possible that one day, food hubs will be all over the island and you’d shop there just as you would at a grocery store or wet market.
How will the pandemic change the way you live or design your home? Share in the Comments below.
Support Schemes and Other Help for Singapore’s Design Community